• Arne Mortensen

Taxation without Representation

October 2013

How does Patrick Henry’s rallying cry, “No taxation without representation,” fit today? Back then King George was the taxing tyrant; today the tyrant is diffuse between federal, local, and state governments and their complicit bureaucracies that demand licenses and fees to feed their own kind. Tyranny at the hand of many is no less a tyranny, to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson.

Undeniably, we do not have representation in the bureaucracy because bureaucrats are unelected. For example, think of our own County building planning department.

Do we have representation in the elected legislatures? The answer is not really. For whatever reason in a typical election only 50% of the electorate votes. Then the winning legislator typically garners no more than 50% of the vote. And in the legislature, let’s assume a “tax/fee” gets approved by 66%. Just do the math: 50% x 50% x 60% = 15%. So, our taxes (and other laws/rules), at best, typically are determined by 15% (often less) of the people. According to a 2010 figure (, Federal, State, and local governments employ 17% of the work force. Is it any wonder that government just grows! Obamacare may be the poster child example of this sad reality. How about the car tabs in Washington State? For additional perspective look at

If Patrick Henry was right to fight tyranny, then we are wrong for putting up with it.

Recent Posts

See All

"We can do better"

I spent a couple of hours at the Millennium meeting on Tuesday, May 24. That was long enough for me to see that the event clearly was only political and not scientific, and that made me sad as I ran

Meet and Greet

The contentious intraparty (both Republican and Democrat) struggle going on has left many of us puzzled as well as apprehensive about the upcoming presidential primary as well as the November general


  • Facebook Clean Grey